Showing posts with label homeopath. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homeopath. Show all posts
Monday, December 29, 2014
Wikipedia asserts that "Pseudoscience is a claim, belief or practice which is falsely presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting scientific evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status."
The "editors" at Wikipedia have deemed homeopathy to be a "pseudoscience" even though randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled studies that have been published in many of the best medical journals in the world have shown efficacy of homeopathic treatment for many common and serious health problems (below is a partial list of such studies):
Jimmy, can you name ONE other system of "pseudoscience" that has a similar body of randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials published in high-impact medical journals showing efficacy of treatment?
It is more than a tad ironic that this first paragraph in the Wikipedia article on homeopathy references only one article that was published in a peer-review medical journal. This one article by Shang, et al. has been thoroughly discredited in an article written by Ludtke and Rutten that was published in a leading "high-impact" journal that specializes in evaluating clinical research. The Shang meta-analysis is highlighted on Wikipedia without reference to any critique of it. The fact that there is no hint of any problems in the Shang review, let alone a reference to the Ludtke and Rutten article that provides evidence of bias, is itself a cause for concern.
The Shang article is also the primary reference used by the widely ridiculed "Evidence Check" reports issued by the Science and Technology Committee of the British House of Commons, which also conveniently omits reference to the severe limitations of this one review of research. Further, the "Evidence Check" was signed off by just three of the 15 members of the original committee, never discussed or endorsed by the whole UK Parliament, and had its recommendations ignored by the UK Department of Health.
It should be made clear that the Shang meta-analysis was co-authored by M. Egger, who is a well-known skeptic of homeopathy and who wrote to The Lancet that his hypothesis before conducting the review was that homeopathy was only a placebo effect. Readers were never informed of this bias.
The meta-analysis by Shang evaluated and compared 110 placebo-controlled trials testing homeopathic medicines with 110 testing conventional drugs, finding 21 homeopathy trials (19%) but only nine (8%) conventional-medicine trials that were of "higher quality." Ludtke and Rutten found that a positive outcome for homeopathy would have resulted if Shang had simply compared these high-quality trials against each other. However, with some clever statistical footwork, Shang chose to limit the high-quality trials to only eight homeopathic and six conventional medical trials, a result that led to a "negative" outcome for homeopathy. Ludtke and Rutten determined this review as biased for its "arbitrarily defined one subset of eight trials" and they deemed the entire review as "falsely negative."
By reducing the number of studies, Shang created convoluted logic that enabled his team to avoid evaluation of ANY of the above high-quality studies that were all published in respected medical journals. Further, seven of eight homeopathic studies only tested one homeopathic medicine for everyone with the similar disease even though one of the primary tenets of homeopathy requires individualization of treatment. Many other extremely scathing critiques of the Shang research were published in The Lancet shortly after publication, including the exclusion of one high-quality homeopathic study due to the questionable assertion that the researchers could not find a study in all of conventional medical research that treated patients with polyarthritis (arthritis that involves five or more joints).
Skeptics typically assert that the above high-quality studies published in high-impact medical journals are simply "cherry-picking" the positive studies, and then, they begin cherry-picking studies that had negative results. However, skeptics of homeopathy fail to differentiate good, sound scientific investigations that are respectful of the homeopathic method and those that are not. Just because a study was conducted with a randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled method does NOT mean that the study gave the appropriate homeopathic medicine for each patient or even each group of patients. This ignorance is akin to someone saying that antibiotics are ineffective for "infections" without differentiating between bacterial infections, viral infections and fungal infections. Ironically, skeptics of homeopathy consistently show a very sloppy attitude about scientific investigations.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047630_Wikipedia_academic_bias_homeopathic_medicine.html#ixzz3NHTclHPw
The "editors" at Wikipedia have deemed homeopathy to be a "pseudoscience" even though randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled studies that have been published in many of the best medical journals in the world have shown efficacy of homeopathic treatment for many common and serious health problems (below is a partial list of such studies):
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Frass, M; Dielacher, C; Linkesch, M; et al. "Influence of potassium dichromate on tracheal secretions in critically ill patients." Chest. March, 2005;127:936-941. The journal, Chest, is the official publication of the American College of Chest Physicians. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- Hayfever: Reilly, D; Taylor, M; McSharry, C; et al., "Is homoeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trial of homoeopathic potency, with pollen in hayfever as model." The Lancet. October 18, 1986, ii: 881-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- Asthma: Reilly, D; Taylor, M; Beattie, N; et al., "Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible?" Lancet. December 10, 1994, 344:1601-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- Fibromyalgia: Bell, IR; Lewis II, DA; Brooks, AJ; et al. "Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo." Rheumatology. 2004:1111-5. This journal is the official journal of the British Society of Rheumatology. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org.
- Fibromyalgia: Fisher, P; Greenwood, A; Huskisson, EC; et al., "Effect of Homoeopathic Treatment on Fibrositis (Primary Fibromyalgia)," BMJ. 299(August 5, 1989):365-6.
- Childhood diarrhea: Jacobs, J; Jimenez, LM; Gloyd, SS. "Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine: a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua." Pediatrics. May, 1994,93,5:719-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- ADD/ADHD: Frei, H; Everts, R; von Ammon, K; Kaufmann, F; Walther, D; Hsu-Schmitz, SF; Collenberg, M; Fuhrer, K; Hassink, R; Steinlin, M; Thurneysen, A. "Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial." Eur J Pediatr. July 27,2005,164:758-767. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Jimmy, can you name ONE other system of "pseudoscience" that has a similar body of randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials published in high-impact medical journals showing efficacy of treatment?
It is more than a tad ironic that this first paragraph in the Wikipedia article on homeopathy references only one article that was published in a peer-review medical journal. This one article by Shang, et al. has been thoroughly discredited in an article written by Ludtke and Rutten that was published in a leading "high-impact" journal that specializes in evaluating clinical research. The Shang meta-analysis is highlighted on Wikipedia without reference to any critique of it. The fact that there is no hint of any problems in the Shang review, let alone a reference to the Ludtke and Rutten article that provides evidence of bias, is itself a cause for concern.
The Shang article is also the primary reference used by the widely ridiculed "Evidence Check" reports issued by the Science and Technology Committee of the British House of Commons, which also conveniently omits reference to the severe limitations of this one review of research. Further, the "Evidence Check" was signed off by just three of the 15 members of the original committee, never discussed or endorsed by the whole UK Parliament, and had its recommendations ignored by the UK Department of Health.
It should be made clear that the Shang meta-analysis was co-authored by M. Egger, who is a well-known skeptic of homeopathy and who wrote to The Lancet that his hypothesis before conducting the review was that homeopathy was only a placebo effect. Readers were never informed of this bias.
The meta-analysis by Shang evaluated and compared 110 placebo-controlled trials testing homeopathic medicines with 110 testing conventional drugs, finding 21 homeopathy trials (19%) but only nine (8%) conventional-medicine trials that were of "higher quality." Ludtke and Rutten found that a positive outcome for homeopathy would have resulted if Shang had simply compared these high-quality trials against each other. However, with some clever statistical footwork, Shang chose to limit the high-quality trials to only eight homeopathic and six conventional medical trials, a result that led to a "negative" outcome for homeopathy. Ludtke and Rutten determined this review as biased for its "arbitrarily defined one subset of eight trials" and they deemed the entire review as "falsely negative."
By reducing the number of studies, Shang created convoluted logic that enabled his team to avoid evaluation of ANY of the above high-quality studies that were all published in respected medical journals. Further, seven of eight homeopathic studies only tested one homeopathic medicine for everyone with the similar disease even though one of the primary tenets of homeopathy requires individualization of treatment. Many other extremely scathing critiques of the Shang research were published in The Lancet shortly after publication, including the exclusion of one high-quality homeopathic study due to the questionable assertion that the researchers could not find a study in all of conventional medical research that treated patients with polyarthritis (arthritis that involves five or more joints).
Skeptics typically assert that the above high-quality studies published in high-impact medical journals are simply "cherry-picking" the positive studies, and then, they begin cherry-picking studies that had negative results. However, skeptics of homeopathy fail to differentiate good, sound scientific investigations that are respectful of the homeopathic method and those that are not. Just because a study was conducted with a randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled method does NOT mean that the study gave the appropriate homeopathic medicine for each patient or even each group of patients. This ignorance is akin to someone saying that antibiotics are ineffective for "infections" without differentiating between bacterial infections, viral infections and fungal infections. Ironically, skeptics of homeopathy consistently show a very sloppy attitude about scientific investigations.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047630_Wikipedia_academic_bias_homeopathic_medicine.html#ixzz3NHTclHPw
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Such statements are a creative use of statistics, or what might be called "lies, damn lies, and statistics." Actually, most clinical research studies conducted with homeopathic medicines show a positive outcome. However, if "creative statisticians" evaluate only the smaller number of large studies, a positive result is less likely, not because homeopathy doesn't work, but because these larger studies tend to dispense only ONE homeopathic medicine for everyone in the study, without any degree of individualized treatment that is typical of the homeopathic method.[1] To claim that homeopathic medicines do not work using only these studies is as illogical as to say that antibiotics are ineffective just because they do not cure for every viral, fungal, or bacterial infection.
Myth #2: "The research studies showing that homeopathic medicines work are 'poorly conducted studies'."
Wrong! Studies showing the efficacy of homeopathic medicines have been published in the Lancet, the British Medical Journal, Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Cochrane Reports, Chest (the publication of the British Society of Rheumatology), Cancer (the journal of the American Cancer Society), Journal of Clinical Oncology (journal of the Society of Clinical Oncology), Human Toxicology, European Journal of Pediatrics, Archives in Facial Plastic Surgery, Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, and many more.[2] ALL of these studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled. Further, because of bias against homeopathy, these studies have been scrutinized rigorously, perhaps even more rigorously than is usual.
The weak response from the homeopathy deniers is that the above studies are "cherry-picked." Well, it seems that there are a lot of "cherries" (clinical studies that verify the efficacy of homeopathic medicines). Also, numerous of the above leading medical journals have published meta-analyzes of clinical trials on specific diseases and have shown that homeopathic medicines have significantly more benefits than does a placebo. And further, the deniers erroneously equate the "negative" studies evidence that the whole system of homeopathy does not work, when, in fact, these studies are usually of a preliminary nature that explored the use of one or a small handful of remedies for a specific condition.
Ironically, the one review of research that the homeopathic deniers most commonly assert as strong evidence that there's no difference between homeopathic medicines and placebo (Shang et al, 2005) has been shown to be bad or certainly inadequate science (Walach, et al, 2005; Fisher, 2006; Rutten, 2009, Rutten and Stolper, 2008; Ludtke and Rutten, 2008).
Myth #3: "12C is like one drop in the entire Atlantic Ocean."
Pure fantasy (and fuzzy math)! In fact, the 12C dose requires 12 test tubes, and 1% of the solution is drawn from each of the 12 test tubes. It is also very typical for the "deniers" of homeopathy to assert with a straight face that the making of a single homeopathic medicine requires more water than exists on the planet. It seems that the skeptics are so fundamentalist in their point of view that they consciously or unconsciously mis-assume that the dilutions used in homeopathy grow proportionately with each dilution; they assume that each dilution requires 10 or 100 times more water with each dilution -- which they don't, and even the most elementary articles and books on homeopathy affirm this fact. Sadly (and strangely), most of the skeptics of homeopathy seem to read each other's misinformation on homeopathy and have a propensity to spin the reality of what homeopathy is in ways that misconstrue it.
Myth #4: "There is nothing in a homeopathic medicine. It is just water."
Ignorance and direct disinformation. First, a large number of homeopathic medicines that are sold in health food stores and pharmacies are what are called "low potencies," that is, small or very small doses of medicines, most of which are in a similar dose to which certain powerful hormones and immune cells circulate in our body. Second, using samples of six different medicines made from minerals, scientists at the Department of Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology have consistently confirmed that the starting substance is still present in the form of nanoparticles of the starting minerals even when the medicine has undergone hundreds of serial dilutions--with vigorous shaking in-between each dilution, as per the homeopathic method (Chikramane, Suresh, Bellare, 2010).[3] Further, leading chemistry and physics journals have published other research to confirm that there are differences between water and "homeopathic water" (Elia and Niccoli, 1999; Elia, Napoli, Niccoli, et al, 2008; Rey, 2003)
Myth #5: "If we do not presently understand how homeopathic medicines work, then, they cannot work. It's witchcraft."
Lame on face value. How many more times in history do scientists and others need before they realize that we do not understand a lot of nature's mysteries, but our lack of understanding does not mean that the mysteries are not real. Calling homeopathy "witchcraft" clearly is someone's fear of what they do not know or understand, and a common observation from history is that whenever one goes on a witchhunt, a witch is found (one way or another). The fact that there is a small but significant body of basic sciences research that has shown physical and biological effects from homeopathic medicines tends to be ignored (Endler, Thieves, Reich, et al 2010; Witt, Bluth, Albrecht, et al, 2007). To publish in peer-reviewed scientific journals is not a common practice from witches (or warlocks).
Dr. Karol Sikora is a respected oncologist and dean of the University of Buckingham medical school (in England). Sikora has expressed serious concern about the "Stalinist repression" that certain skeptics of homeopathic and alternative medicines engage (Sikora, 2009). Sikora has harshly criticized "armchair physicians" and others who seem to have little or no experience in using these treatments with real patients.
One other critical piece of evidence to show and even prove the unscientific attitude of the homeopathy deniers is that they now wish to close off all discussion of the efficacy of homeopathic medicines (Baum and Ernst, 2009). These medical fundamentalist actually discourage keeping an open mind about homeopathy. One must question this unscientific attitude that select antagonists to homeopathy embody...and one must even wonder why they maintain such a position.
The second part of this article will provide further specific evidence of the unscientific attitude and actions from those individuals and organizations who are leading the campaign against homeopathy. A leading antagonist to homeopathy from the US and another from the UK will discussed in order to shed light on this important debate in health care. Stay tuned to find out who they are and why they maintain their point of view.
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Poor Posture can Trigger Neck and Shoulder Pain
You probably heard it from mom when you were a kid: “Stand up straight!” Fast forward to adulthood and one look in the mirror might show that the stresses of everyday life are taking a toll on your body: there’s the 9 to 5 grind, deadlines and demands, long hours of sitting in front of a computer— all of which can result in poor posture.
Not sure if you suffer from poor posture? If you answer yes to any of these, then you do.
• Do the bottoms of your shoes wear in certain places?
• Are your shoulders rounded?
• Do you have aches and pains in your neck or back?
Posture correction of the cervical spine is indicated as treatment method of text neck, cervical spondylitis and headache. The correction of head posture can transform the quality of healthy life of patients who present with Text Neck. This is a matter of high concern that requires complex attention.
tAGS:
You probably heard it from mom when you were a kid: “Stand up straight!” Fast forward to adulthood and one look in the mirror might show that the stresses of everyday life are taking a toll on your body: there’s the 9 to 5 grind, deadlines and demands, long hours of sitting in front of a computer— all of which can result in poor posture.
Not sure if you suffer from poor posture? If you answer yes to any of these, then you do.
• Do the bottoms of your shoes wear in certain places?
• Are your shoulders rounded?
• Do you have aches and pains in your neck or back?
Posture correction of the cervical spine is indicated as treatment method of text neck, cervical spondylitis and headache. The correction of head posture can transform the quality of healthy life of patients who present with Text Neck. This is a matter of high concern that requires complex attention.
tAGS:
neck pain , cervical spondylosis ,
cervical spondylitis , neck pain home remedies , shoulder pain medicine , neck
pain, cervical spondylosis, cervical spondylitis, neck pain home remedies,
shoulder pain medicine, shoulder pain, lower back pain, spinal stenosis,
sciatica, chiropractor, pinched nerve, spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc
disease, sciatic nerve, low back pain, sciatica pain relief, herniated disc,
upper back pain, cervical spine, stiff neck, lumbar spine, neck pain causes,
headache, lumbar spondylosis, right shoulder pain, sciatica symptoms, back pain
causes, sciatic nerve pain, leg pain, pinched nerve in neck, pain in the neck,
lower left back pain, pain in neck, back problems, back spasms, bulging disc,
sciatica treatment, arm pain, disc herniation, shoulder blade pain, pain in
shoulder, chiropractic, lower back pain exercises, shoulder joint pain, severe
neck pain, pain in lower back, lumbar stenosis, exercises for lower back pain,
sciatic pain, middle back pain, trapped nerve, spinal stenosis treatment,
severe back pain, lumbar spinal stenosis, left shoulder pain, laminectomy,
cervical spinal stenosis, shoulder pain causes, sciatic nerve pain relief,
nerve pain, causes of lower back pain, slipped disc, spinal stenosis surgery,
neck problems, neck and back pain, back and neck pain, cervical spondylosis
treatment, exercise for back pain, back neck pain, sciatica exercises, neck
pain symptoms, backache, spinal decompression, sciatica relief, pinched nerve
in lower back, causes of neck pain, pain in left shoulder, pain in back of neck,
spondylosis treatment, lumbar pain, back pain remedies, back of neck pain,
chronic lower back pain, low back pain exercises, what causes neck pain, pain
in back, back pain exercises, herniated disk, cervical arthritis, neck injury,
chronic shoulder pain, shoulder problems, back surgery, causes of shoulder pain,
neck arthritis, cervical spondylosis symptoms, neck ache, lower back, cervical
spondylotic myelopathy, lumbar disc herniation, myofascial pain, pain in
shoulder blade, upper back pain causes, pain in upper back, pinched nerve lower
back, spondylosis cervical, cervical stenosis, cervical radiculopathy, low back
pain treatment, low back pain causes, upper back pain relief, cervical
spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic back pain, chest and back pain, sciatic
nerve relief, cervical disc herniation, arthritis in the neck, ruptured disc,
what causes shoulder pain, shoulder pain exercises, herniated disc treatment,
treatment for back pain, chiropractic adjustment, shoulder pain symptoms, spine
pain, as back pain, stiff neck pain, lower right back pain, bad back pain,
spondylotic changes, back pain lower, back and leg pain, treatment for sciatica,
extreme lower back pain, neck nerve pain, pinched nerve neck, herniated disc
symptoms, treatment for lower back pain, sciatic nerve treatment, cervical
spondylosis exercises, pain in right shoulder, back pain solutions, disk
herniation, lower leg pain, upper neck pain, sciatica pain treatment, pain in
shoulder and arm, pain in the back of the neck, exercises for low back pain,
cervical osteoarthritis, lumbar spine pain, chronic neck and shoulder pain,
lumbar back pain, sore shoulder, neck pain exercises, cervical myelopathy, neck
and head pain, cervical neck pain, lower back pain right side, cervical disc
disease, muscle pain in neck, head pain, herniated disc surgery, remedies for
back pain, lower neck pain, lower back muscle pain, pain in shoulder joint,
treatment for spinal stenosis, constant lower back pain, neck stiffness, muscle
pain in shoulder, spinal decompression therapy, lower back problems, pinched
nerves, sore lower back, head and neck pain, pinched nerve treatment, lower
back strain, sore neck muscles, neck pain diagnosis, chronic low back pain,
pain in the back, pain in the lower back, stiff neck remedies, exercises for
neck pain, stiff neck causes, painful shoulder, shoulder pain cancer, neck and
arm pain, lumbar laminectomy, painful neck, acute back pain, pain in left
shoulder blade, pain in right shoulder blade, sharp lower back pain, back pain
diagnosis, sudden lower back pain, acupuncture for back pain, relieve lower
back pain, left shoulder blade pain, leg pain causes, cervical spondylosis
surgery, bad neck pain, neck pain and stiffness, pain in both shoulders, back
injury, lower back and leg pain, decompression therapy, disc bulge, neck back
pain, relieve neck pain, relieve back pain, extreme back pain, pain in neck and
back, sudden back pain, herniated cervical disc, home remedies for neck pain,
lumbar spondylosis treatment, right shoulder blade pain, chiropractic care,
cervical spondylosis without myelopathy, arthritis of the neck, sciatic nerve
exercises, degenerative spondylolisthesis, pinched nerve in neck treatment,
neck exercises for neck pain, arm and shoulder pain, sciatica back pain,
constant back pain, bulging disk, top of shoulder pain, spondylosis of the neck,
back and neck pain relief, symptoms of back pain, extreme shoulder pain,
extreme neck pain, pinched sciatic nerve, arthritis neck, pinched nerve back,
arthritis in neck, sciatica cure, back pain management, acute lower back pain,
pinched nerve in neck symptoms, back of the neck pain, bad lower back pain,
lower back pain left side, pinched nerve in back, back relief
Monday, July 7, 2014
Do you ever suffer with constant neck and shoulder movement pain or neck stiffness, particularly after a night's rest, radiating pain from neck to arms on both side or back of head, vertigo, headache, numbness of hands and weakness in hands, may feel irritable, fatigue, disturb sleep and impair ability to work.
The chaotic lifestyle which includes spending long hours on computer or in driving, wrong posture while working, sleeping or watching T.V. has markedly increased the incidence of cervical spondylitis at a younger age. This can signal overuse problems, most commonly with the structures of the cervical spine.
If cervical spondylitis is left untreated can lead to: Increase pressure on spinal cord, Increase pressure on nerves, Increase pressure on vertebral column and ischemic stroke.
Cervical Spondylitis is a degenerative disease affecting the joints of the cervical vertebrae (Bones of the back of neck) with deposition of minerals in the discs (cushions), which is present in between the vertebral bones.
Every patient with CS should make a note of the following:
CS is age related degenerative condition of cervical spine.
Has risk factors related to occupation and posture which occur at any age group.
Available treatments just reduce the symptoms and have alot of limitations:
Available Treatments
Cervical Spondylitis is a deep seated degenerative disease, which requires treatment at a deeper level. The conventional treatment alone is not enough in most cases. Added homeopathic medication is strongly suggested in order to get.
Excellent relief in pain and stiffness
Marked reduction in the inflammation of the disc
Improved mobility of neck and hands
Improvement in tingling and numbness which may be there is patients who have nerve compression
Reduced need for pain killer. You may be able to stop pain killers
But the real remedy for spondylitis treatment ! This is SPONDIN DROPS
Unique production technology of BHARGAVA PHYTOLAB provides you SPONDIN DROPS an all-natural solution that will allow you to support the health of your neck and finally kick the pain jailer out of your life for good.
Unique ingredients list of SPONDIN DROPS: Colocynthis vulgaris,Ruta graveolens, Hypericum perforatum, Ledum palustre, Cuprum metallicum, Dulcamera and Conium maculatum.
Colocynthis vulgaris - Remedy for constrictions and contractions felt wherever in the body, thus, indicated in muscle cramps; headache; & neuralgia esp. pain radiating to right side of neck, shoulders, arms & hands.
Ruta graveolens - Acts on periosteum and cartilages indicated by pain in nape of neck, back.
Hypericum perforatum- Acts on nerve endings releasing their compression & inflammation indicated in pain in nape of neck radiating to arms to fingers; pressure over sacrum; spinal concussion; coccyx injury from RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) with pain radiating up spine.
Ledum palustre - Indicated in painful stiffness in neck & back after sitting esp. radiating to left side of neck, shoulders, arms & hands, aggravated by cold or cold water.
Cuprum metallicum - Indicated in hyperesthesia of spinal column; twitching of muscles of back up to neck.
Dulcamara - Indicated in stiff neck esp. in damp weather; pain in small of back; shooting contractions in the loins, shoulders and arms.
Conium maculatum - Indicated in tension, stiffness & pain in the nape of the neck as from friction in the cervical vertebrae or sprains; pain between shoulders; vertigo & headache.
tAGS:
The chaotic lifestyle which includes spending long hours on computer or in driving, wrong posture while working, sleeping or watching T.V. has markedly increased the incidence of cervical spondylitis at a younger age. This can signal overuse problems, most commonly with the structures of the cervical spine.
If cervical spondylitis is left untreated can lead to: Increase pressure on spinal cord, Increase pressure on nerves, Increase pressure on vertebral column and ischemic stroke.
Cervical Spondylitis is a degenerative disease affecting the joints of the cervical vertebrae (Bones of the back of neck) with deposition of minerals in the discs (cushions), which is present in between the vertebral bones.
Every patient with CS should make a note of the following:
CS is age related degenerative condition of cervical spine.
Has risk factors related to occupation and posture which occur at any age group.
Available treatments just reduce the symptoms and have alot of limitations:
Available Treatments
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Ointments
- Ordinary painkillers
- Causes reduction in the protective mucus in the stomach, which can cause stomach irritation, heartburn and gastritis.
- Pain reliever ointments although are meant for topical application but also cause problems like skin irritation and burning sensation. Also cause discomfort and reluctance due to peculiar order.
- Duration of action is limited only for few hours.
Cervical Spondylitis is a deep seated degenerative disease, which requires treatment at a deeper level. The conventional treatment alone is not enough in most cases. Added homeopathic medication is strongly suggested in order to get.
Excellent relief in pain and stiffness
Marked reduction in the inflammation of the disc
Improved mobility of neck and hands
Improvement in tingling and numbness which may be there is patients who have nerve compression
Reduced need for pain killer. You may be able to stop pain killers
But the real remedy for spondylitis treatment ! This is SPONDIN DROPS
Unique production technology of BHARGAVA PHYTOLAB provides you SPONDIN DROPS an all-natural solution that will allow you to support the health of your neck and finally kick the pain jailer out of your life for good.
Unique ingredients list of SPONDIN DROPS: Colocynthis vulgaris,Ruta graveolens, Hypericum perforatum, Ledum palustre, Cuprum metallicum, Dulcamera and Conium maculatum.
Colocynthis vulgaris - Remedy for constrictions and contractions felt wherever in the body, thus, indicated in muscle cramps; headache; & neuralgia esp. pain radiating to right side of neck, shoulders, arms & hands.
Ruta graveolens - Acts on periosteum and cartilages indicated by pain in nape of neck, back.
Hypericum perforatum- Acts on nerve endings releasing their compression & inflammation indicated in pain in nape of neck radiating to arms to fingers; pressure over sacrum; spinal concussion; coccyx injury from RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury) with pain radiating up spine.
Ledum palustre - Indicated in painful stiffness in neck & back after sitting esp. radiating to left side of neck, shoulders, arms & hands, aggravated by cold or cold water.
Cuprum metallicum - Indicated in hyperesthesia of spinal column; twitching of muscles of back up to neck.
Dulcamara - Indicated in stiff neck esp. in damp weather; pain in small of back; shooting contractions in the loins, shoulders and arms.
Conium maculatum - Indicated in tension, stiffness & pain in the nape of the neck as from friction in the cervical vertebrae or sprains; pain between shoulders; vertigo & headache.
tAGS:
neck pain , cervical spondylosis ,
cervical spondylitis , neck pain home remedies , shoulder pain medicine , neck
pain, cervical spondylosis, cervical spondylitis, neck pain home remedies,
shoulder pain medicine, shoulder pain, lower back pain, spinal stenosis,
sciatica, chiropractor, pinched nerve, spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc
disease, sciatic nerve, low back pain, sciatica pain relief, herniated disc,
upper back pain, cervical spine, stiff neck, lumbar spine, neck pain causes,
headache, lumbar spondylosis, right shoulder pain, sciatica symptoms, back pain
causes, sciatic nerve pain, leg pain, pinched nerve in neck, pain in the neck,
lower left back pain, pain in neck, back problems, back spasms, bulging disc,
sciatica treatment, arm pain, disc herniation, shoulder blade pain, pain in
shoulder, chiropractic, lower back pain exercises, shoulder joint pain, severe
neck pain, pain in lower back, lumbar stenosis, exercises for lower back pain,
sciatic pain, middle back pain, trapped nerve, spinal stenosis treatment,
severe back pain, lumbar spinal stenosis, left shoulder pain, laminectomy,
cervical spinal stenosis, shoulder pain causes, sciatic nerve pain relief,
nerve pain, causes of lower back pain, slipped disc, spinal stenosis surgery,
neck problems, neck and back pain, back and neck pain, cervical spondylosis
treatment, exercise for back pain, back neck pain, sciatica exercises, neck
pain symptoms, backache, spinal decompression, sciatica relief, pinched nerve
in lower back, causes of neck pain, pain in left shoulder, pain in back of neck,
spondylosis treatment, lumbar pain, back pain remedies, back of neck pain,
chronic lower back pain, low back pain exercises, what causes neck pain, pain
in back, back pain exercises, herniated disk, cervical arthritis, neck injury,
chronic shoulder pain, shoulder problems, back surgery, causes of shoulder pain,
neck arthritis, cervical spondylosis symptoms, neck ache, lower back, cervical
spondylotic myelopathy, lumbar disc herniation, myofascial pain, pain in
shoulder blade, upper back pain causes, pain in upper back, pinched nerve lower
back, spondylosis cervical, cervical stenosis, cervical radiculopathy, low back
pain treatment, low back pain causes, upper back pain relief, cervical
spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic back pain, chest and back pain, sciatic
nerve relief, cervical disc herniation, arthritis in the neck, ruptured disc,
what causes shoulder pain, shoulder pain exercises, herniated disc treatment,
treatment for back pain, chiropractic adjustment, shoulder pain symptoms, spine
pain, as back pain, stiff neck pain, lower right back pain, bad back pain,
spondylotic changes, back pain lower, back and leg pain, treatment for sciatica,
extreme lower back pain, neck nerve pain, pinched nerve neck, herniated disc
symptoms, treatment for lower back pain, sciatic nerve treatment, cervical
spondylosis exercises, pain in right shoulder, back pain solutions, disk
herniation, lower leg pain, upper neck pain, sciatica pain treatment, pain in
shoulder and arm, pain in the back of the neck, exercises for low back pain,
cervical osteoarthritis, lumbar spine pain, chronic neck and shoulder pain,
lumbar back pain, sore shoulder, neck pain exercises, cervical myelopathy, neck
and head pain, cervical neck pain, lower back pain right side, cervical disc
disease, muscle pain in neck, head pain, herniated disc surgery, remedies for
back pain, lower neck pain, lower back muscle pain, pain in shoulder joint,
treatment for spinal stenosis, constant lower back pain, neck stiffness, muscle
pain in shoulder, spinal decompression therapy, lower back problems, pinched
nerves, sore lower back, head and neck pain, pinched nerve treatment, lower
back strain, sore neck muscles, neck pain diagnosis, chronic low back pain,
pain in the back, pain in the lower back, stiff neck remedies, exercises for
neck pain, stiff neck causes, painful shoulder, shoulder pain cancer, neck and
arm pain, lumbar laminectomy, painful neck, acute back pain, pain in left
shoulder blade, pain in right shoulder blade, sharp lower back pain, back pain
diagnosis, sudden lower back pain, acupuncture for back pain, relieve lower
back pain, left shoulder blade pain, leg pain causes, cervical spondylosis
surgery, bad neck pain, neck pain and stiffness, pain in both shoulders, back
injury, lower back and leg pain, decompression therapy, disc bulge, neck back
pain, relieve neck pain, relieve back pain, extreme back pain, pain in neck and
back, sudden back pain, herniated cervical disc, home remedies for neck pain,
lumbar spondylosis treatment, right shoulder blade pain, chiropractic care,
cervical spondylosis without myelopathy, arthritis of the neck, sciatic nerve
exercises, degenerative spondylolisthesis, pinched nerve in neck treatment,
neck exercises for neck pain, arm and shoulder pain, sciatica back pain,
constant back pain, bulging disk, top of shoulder pain, spondylosis of the neck,
back and neck pain relief, symptoms of back pain, extreme shoulder pain,
extreme neck pain, pinched sciatic nerve, arthritis neck, pinched nerve back,
arthritis in neck, sciatica cure, back pain management, acute lower back pain,
pinched nerve in neck symptoms, back of the neck pain, bad lower back pain,
lower back pain left side, pinched nerve in back, back relief
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Cervical spondylitis and cervical spondylosis are both disorders that affect the region surrounding the neck and shoulder. It develops as... -
How Homeopathy Works * Fact 1 - Hippocrates 'The Father of Medicine' of Ancient Greece said there were two Laws of Healing: ... -
Myth #1: "There is no research that shows that homeopathic medicines work." Such statements are a creative use of statistics... -
A 28 years old male, call centre professional, has to work in front of computer for around 10-12 hrs continuously, was complaining of neck ...
