Is homeopathy really a "pseudoscience"?

Wikipedia asserts that "Pseudoscience is a claim, belief or practice which is falsely presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting scientific evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status."

The "editors" at Wikipedia have deemed homeopathy to be a "pseudoscience" even though randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled studies that have been published in many of the best medical journals in the world have shown efficacy of homeopathic treatment for many common and serious health problems (below is a partial list of such studies):

• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Frass, M; Dielacher, C; Linkesch, M; et al. "Influence of potassium dichromate on tracheal secretions in critically ill patients." Chest. March, 2005;127:936-941. The journal, Chest, is the official publication of the American College of Chest Physicians. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


• Hayfever: Reilly, D; Taylor, M; McSharry, C; et al., "Is homoeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trial of homoeopathic potency, with pollen in hayfever as model." The Lancet. October 18, 1986, ii: 881-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


• Asthma: Reilly, D; Taylor, M; Beattie, N; et al., "Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible?" Lancet. December 10, 1994, 344:1601-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


• Fibromyalgia: Bell, IR; Lewis II, DA; Brooks, AJ; et al. "Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo." Rheumatology. 2004:1111-5. This journal is the official journal of the British Society of Rheumatology. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org.


• Fibromyalgia: Fisher, P; Greenwood, A; Huskisson, EC; et al., "Effect of Homoeopathic Treatment on Fibrositis (Primary Fibromyalgia)," BMJ. 299(August 5, 1989):365-6.


• Childhood diarrhea: Jacobs, J; Jimenez, LM; Gloyd, SS. "Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine: a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua." Pediatrics. May, 1994,93,5:719-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


• ADD/ADHD: Frei, H; Everts, R; von Ammon, K; Kaufmann, F; Walther, D; Hsu-Schmitz, SF; Collenberg, M; Fuhrer, K; Hassink, R; Steinlin, M; Thurneysen, A. "Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial." Eur J Pediatr. July 27,2005,164:758-767. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Jimmy, can you name ONE other system of "pseudoscience" that has a similar body of randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials published in high-impact medical journals showing efficacy of treatment?

It is more than a tad ironic that this first paragraph in the Wikipedia article on homeopathy references only one article that was published in a peer-review medical journal. This one article by Shang, et al. has been thoroughly discredited in an article written by Ludtke and Rutten that was published in a leading "high-impact" journal that specializes in evaluating clinical research. The Shang meta-analysis is highlighted on Wikipedia without reference to any critique of it. The fact that there is no hint of any problems in the Shang review, let alone a reference to the Ludtke and Rutten article that provides evidence of bias, is itself a cause for concern.

The Shang article is also the primary reference used by the widely ridiculed "Evidence Check" reports issued by the Science and Technology Committee of the British House of Commons, which also conveniently omits reference to the severe limitations of this one review of research. Further, the "Evidence Check" was signed off by just three of the 15 members of the original committee, never discussed or endorsed by the whole UK Parliament, and had its recommendations ignored by the UK Department of Health.

It should be made clear that the Shang meta-analysis was co-authored by M. Egger, who is a well-known skeptic of homeopathy and who wrote to The Lancet that his hypothesis before conducting the review was that homeopathy was only a placebo effect. Readers were never informed of this bias.

The meta-analysis by Shang evaluated and compared 110 placebo-controlled trials testing homeopathic medicines with 110 testing conventional drugs, finding 21 homeopathy trials (19%) but only nine (8%) conventional-medicine trials that were of "higher quality." Ludtke and Rutten found that a positive outcome for homeopathy would have resulted if Shang had simply compared these high-quality trials against each other. However, with some clever statistical footwork, Shang chose to limit the high-quality trials to only eight homeopathic and six conventional medical trials, a result that led to a "negative" outcome for homeopathy. Ludtke and Rutten determined this review as biased for its "arbitrarily defined one subset of eight trials" and they deemed the entire review as "falsely negative."

By reducing the number of studies, Shang created convoluted logic that enabled his team to avoid evaluation of ANY of the above high-quality studies that were all published in respected medical journals. Further, seven of eight homeopathic studies only tested one homeopathic medicine for everyone with the similar disease even though one of the primary tenets of homeopathy requires individualization of treatment. Many other extremely scathing critiques of the Shang research were published in The Lancet shortly after publication, including the exclusion of one high-quality homeopathic study due to the questionable assertion that the researchers could not find a study in all of conventional medical research that treated patients with polyarthritis (arthritis that involves five or more joints).

Skeptics typically assert that the above high-quality studies published in high-impact medical journals are simply "cherry-picking" the positive studies, and then, they begin cherry-picking studies that had negative results. However, skeptics of homeopathy fail to differentiate good, sound scientific investigations that are respectful of the homeopathic method and those that are not. Just because a study was conducted with a randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled method does NOT mean that the study gave the appropriate homeopathic medicine for each patient or even each group of patients. This ignorance is akin to someone saying that antibiotics are ineffective for "infections" without differentiating between bacterial infections, viral infections and fungal infections. Ironically, skeptics of homeopathy consistently show a very sloppy attitude about scientific investigations.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047630_Wikipedia_academic_bias_homeopathic_medicine.html#ixzz3NHTclHPw

Read More

The Myths Spread about Homeopathy

Myth #1: "There is no research that shows that homeopathic medicines work."

Such statements are a creative use of statistics, or what might be called "lies, damn lies, and statistics." Actually, most clinical research studies conducted with homeopathic medicines show a positive outcome. However, if "creative statisticians" evaluate only the smaller number of large studies, a positive result is less likely, not because homeopathy doesn't work, but because these larger studies tend to dispense only ONE homeopathic medicine for everyone in the study, without any degree of individualized treatment that is typical of the homeopathic method.[1] To claim that homeopathic medicines do not work using only these studies is as illogical as to say that antibiotics are ineffective just because they do not cure for every viral, fungal, or bacterial infection.

Myth #2: "The research studies showing that homeopathic medicines work are 'poorly conducted studies'."

Wrong! Studies showing the efficacy of homeopathic medicines have been published in the Lancet, the British Medical Journal, Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Cochrane Reports, Chest (the publication of the British Society of Rheumatology), Cancer (the journal of the American Cancer Society), Journal of Clinical Oncology (journal of the Society of Clinical Oncology), Human Toxicology, European Journal of Pediatrics, Archives in Facial Plastic Surgery, Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, and many more.[2] ALL of these studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled. Further, because of bias against homeopathy, these studies have been scrutinized rigorously, perhaps even more rigorously than is usual.

The weak response from the homeopathy deniers is that the above studies are "cherry-picked." Well, it seems that there are a lot of "cherries" (clinical studies that verify the efficacy of homeopathic medicines). Also, numerous of the above leading medical journals have published meta-analyzes of clinical trials on specific diseases and have shown that homeopathic medicines have significantly more benefits than does a placebo. And further, the deniers erroneously equate the "negative" studies evidence that the whole system of homeopathy does not work, when, in fact, these studies are usually of a preliminary nature that explored the use of one or a small handful of remedies for a specific condition.

Ironically, the one review of research that the homeopathic deniers most commonly assert as strong evidence that there's no difference between homeopathic medicines and placebo (Shang et al, 2005) has been shown to be bad or certainly inadequate science (Walach, et al, 2005; Fisher, 2006; Rutten, 2009, Rutten and Stolper, 2008; Ludtke and Rutten, 2008).

Myth #3: "12C is like one drop in the entire Atlantic Ocean."

Pure fantasy (and fuzzy math)! In fact, the 12C dose requires 12 test tubes, and 1% of the solution is drawn from each of the 12 test tubes. It is also very typical for the "deniers" of homeopathy to assert with a straight face that the making of a single homeopathic medicine requires more water than exists on the planet. It seems that the skeptics are so fundamentalist in their point of view that they consciously or unconsciously mis-assume that the dilutions used in homeopathy grow proportionately with each dilution; they assume that each dilution requires 10 or 100 times more water with each dilution -- which they don't, and even the most elementary articles and books on homeopathy affirm this fact. Sadly (and strangely), most of the skeptics of homeopathy seem to read each other's misinformation on homeopathy and have a propensity to spin the reality of what homeopathy is in ways that misconstrue it.

Myth #4: "There is nothing in a homeopathic medicine. It is just water."

Ignorance and direct disinformation. First, a large number of homeopathic medicines that are sold in health food stores and pharmacies are what are called "low potencies," that is, small or very small doses of medicines, most of which are in a similar dose to which certain powerful hormones and immune cells circulate in our body. Second, using samples of six different medicines made from minerals, scientists at the Department of Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology have consistently confirmed that the starting substance is still present in the form of nanoparticles of the starting minerals even when the medicine has undergone hundreds of serial dilutions--with vigorous shaking in-between each dilution, as per the homeopathic method (Chikramane, Suresh, Bellare, 2010).[3] Further, leading chemistry and physics journals have published other research to confirm that there are differences between water and "homeopathic water" (Elia and Niccoli, 1999; Elia, Napoli, Niccoli, et al, 2008; Rey, 2003)

Myth #5: "If we do not presently understand how homeopathic medicines work, then, they cannot work. It's witchcraft."

Lame on face value. How many more times in history do scientists and others need before they realize that we do not understand a lot of nature's mysteries, but our lack of understanding does not mean that the mysteries are not real. Calling homeopathy "witchcraft" clearly is someone's fear of what they do not know or understand, and a common observation from history is that whenever one goes on a witchhunt, a witch is found (one way or another). The fact that there is a small but significant body of basic sciences research that has shown physical and biological effects from homeopathic medicines tends to be ignored (Endler, Thieves, Reich, et al 2010; Witt, Bluth, Albrecht, et al, 2007). To publish in peer-reviewed scientific journals is not a common practice from witches (or warlocks).

Dr. Karol Sikora is a respected oncologist and dean of the University of Buckingham medical school (in England). Sikora has expressed serious concern about the "Stalinist repression" that certain skeptics of homeopathic and alternative medicines engage (Sikora, 2009). Sikora has harshly criticized "armchair physicians" and others who seem to have little or no experience in using these treatments with real patients.

One other critical piece of evidence to show and even prove the unscientific attitude of the homeopathy deniers is that they now wish to close off all discussion of the efficacy of homeopathic medicines (Baum and Ernst, 2009). These medical fundamentalist actually discourage keeping an open mind about homeopathy. One must question this unscientific attitude that select antagonists to homeopathy embody...and one must even wonder why they maintain such a position.

The second part of this article will provide further specific evidence of the unscientific attitude and actions from those individuals and organizations who are leading the campaign against homeopathy. A leading antagonist to homeopathy from the US and another from the UK will discussed in order to shed light on this important debate in health care. Stay tuned to find out who they are and why they maintain their point of view.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034097_homeopathy_myths.html#ixzz3MQaaJuQ9

Read More

Presenting 50 Facts About How Homeopathy Works ?????

How Homeopathy Works

* Fact 1 - Hippocrates 'The Father of Medicine' of Ancient Greece said there were two Laws of Healing: The Law of Opposites and the Law of Similars. Homeopathy treats the patient with medicines using the Law of Similars, orthodox medicine uses the Law of Opposites, e.g. antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anticonvulsants, antihypertensives, anti-depressants, anti-psychotics.

* Fact 2 - Homeopathic theories are based on fixed principles of the Laws of Nature which do not change -- unlike medical theories which are constantly changing!

* Fact 3 - Homeopathy is an evidence-based, empirical medicine.

* Fact 4 - Homeopathy is both an art and a science.

* Fact 5 - The Homeopathic provings of medicines are a more scientific method of testing than the orthodox model.

* Fact 6 - Homeopathic medicine awakens and stimulates the body's own curative powers. The potentized remedy acts as a catalyst to set healing into motion.

* Fact 7 - Homeopathic medicines work by communicating a current/pattern/frequency of energy via the whole human body to jump start the body's own inherent healing mechanisms.

* Fact 8 - Homeopathy assists the body to heal itself, to overcome an illness which brings the patient to a higher level of health. Orthodox medicine suppresses the illness, bringing the patient to a lower level of health.

* Fact 9 - The homeopathic practitioner endeavours to search for and treat the cause of the disease in order to heal the effect.

* Fact 10 - Outcomes of homeopathic treatment are measured by the long term curative effects of prescribing and complete eradication of the disease state.

* Fact 11 - The homeopathic practitioner treats the whole person, believing all symptoms are interrelated and seeks to select a medicine which most closely covers them all.

Homeopathic Medicines

* Fact 12 - Homeopathic remedies are cheap.

* Fact 13 - Pharmaceutical medicines are expensive.

* Fact 14 - There are more than 4,000 homeopathic medicines.

* Fact 15 - Homeopathic medicines have no toxic side-effects.

* Fact 16 - Homeopathic medicines are non-addictive.

* Fact 17 - Every true homeopathic medicine is made using one substance -- whether plant, mineral, metal, etc. The exact substance is known, unlike most modern drugs where we are rarely informed of the ingredients.

* Fact 18 - Any remedy up to a 12c or a 24x potency still contains the original molecules of the substance and this is known as Avogadro's number.

* Fact 19 - Every Patient is Unique so homeopathic medicines are individualized.

* Fact 20 - Homeopaths treat genetic illness, tracing its origins to 6 main genetic causes: Tuberculosis, Syphilis, Gonorrhoea, Psora (scabies), Cancer, Leprosy.

* Fact 21 - Epidemics such as cholera and typhoid were treated successfully using homeopathy in the 19th century with very high success rates, compared to orthodox medicine (http://www.whale.to/v/winston.html) .

* Fact 22 - There are thousands of homeopathic books, available at specialist outlets, not sold in the high street.

Homeopathic Hospitals

* Fact 23 - There are 5 homeopathic hospitals in the U.K. -- in London, Tunbridge Wells, Bristol, Liverpool and Glasgow. They cost the NHS under £10 million a year compared to the £100 billion for the total annual NHS budget for 2008!

* Fact 24 - At one of the earliest debates on the NHS Act of 1948 the Government pledged that homoeopathy would continue to be available on the NHS, as long as there were "patients wishing to receive it and doctors willing to provide it".

* Fact 25 - There is a campaign by certain U.K. Professors to oust homeopathy completely from the NHS after they wrote on NHS headed paper to all Primary Care Trusts in 2006 telling managers not to refer patients to the homeopathic hospitals.

* Fact 26 - The Homeopathic Hospitals are clean, with friendly, well informed staff. The patients are generally pleased with their treatment unlike many orthodox National Health Service hospitals.

* Fact 27 - The chances of contracting MRSA or C. Difficile at a Homeopathic Hospital are extremely rare.

* Fact 28 - Unlike orthodox medicine where two thirds of all conventional hospital admissions are due to the side-effects of pharmaceutical medicines, the bill for negligence claims soaring into billions, one U.K. leading insurance company reported only 'a couple' of claims against homeopaths in a ten year period!

Orthodox Medicine Opposing Homeopathy

* Fact 29 - In the United States in the early 1900s there were 22 homeopathic medical schools and over 100 homeopathic hospitals, 60 orphanages and old people's homes and 1,000+ homeopathic pharmacies.

* Fact 30 - Members of the American Medical Association had great animosity towards homeopathy after its formation in 1847 and it was decided to purge all local medical societies of physicians who were homeopaths.

* Fact 31 - Big Pharma does not want the Public to find out how well homeopathy works!

Scientific Studies

* Fact 32 - In 2005 the World Health Organisation brought out a draft report which showed homeopathy was beneficial causing Big Pharma to panic and The Lancet to bring out an editorial entitled 'The End of Homeopathy'.

* Fact 33 - In 2005 The Lancet tried to destroy homeopathy but were only looking at 8 inconclusive trials out of 110 of which 102 were positive. This was a fraudulent analysis.
"The meta-analysis at the centre of the controversy is based on 110 placebo-controlled clinical trials of homeopathy and 110 clinical trials of allopathy (conventional medicine), which are said to be matched. These were reduced to 21 trials of homeopathy and 9 of conventional medicine of 'higher quality' and further reduced to 8 and 6 trials, respectively, which were 'larger, higher quality'. The final analysis which concluded that 'the clinical effects of homoeopathy are placebo effects' was based on just the eight 'larger, higher quality' clinical trials of homeopathy. The Lancet's press release did not mention this, instead giving the impression that the conclusions were based on all 110 trials."
(http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerend...)

* Fact 34 - There have been many clinical trials that prove homeopathy works. In the past 24 years there have been more than 180 controlled, and 118 randomized, trials into homeopathy, which were analysed by four separate meta-analyses. In each case, the researchers concluded that the benefits of homeopathy went far beyond that which could be explained purely by the placebo effect.

* Fact 35 - The Bristol Homeopathic Hospital carried out a study published in November 2005 of 6500 patients receiving homeopathic treatment. There was an overall improvement in health of 70% of them (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/4...) .

* Fact 36 - Homeopathy can never be properly tested through double blind randomised trials because each prescription is individualised as every patient is unique. Therefore 10 people with arthritis, for example, may all need a different homeopathic medicine.

* Fact 37 - Homeopathic medicines are not tested on animals.

* Fact 38 - Homeopathic medicines work even better on animals and babies than on adults, proving this cannot be placebo.

* Fact 39 - Scientists agree that if and when homeopathy is accepted by the scientific community it will turn established science on its head.

Homeopathic Practitioners

* Fact 40 - Homeopathic Practitioners train for 4 years in Anatomy and Physiology, as well as Pathology and Disease, Materia Medica, Homeopathic Philosophy and study of the Homeopathic Repertory.

* Fact 41 - Most homeopaths treat patients who have been referred to them by word of mouth. Most patients seek out homeopathy because conventional treatment has not benefited them or because it poses too great a risk of side-effects.

* Fact 42 - The homeopathic community has thousands, even millions, of written case notes that demonstrate the positive benefits of their treatment. Some homeopaths have video proof of their patients before and after treatment.

* Fact 43 - Homeopaths charge patients an average of £50 an hour. Specialist Doctors can charge up to £200 or more.

Popularity of Homeopathy

* Fact 44 - The popularity of homeopathy has grown in the past 30 years, its revival entirely through word of mouth and estimated to be growing at more than 20% a year the world over.

* Fact 45 - Hundreds of famous people throughout the past 200 years have enjoyed the benefits of homeopathic medicine (www.homeopathicrevolution.com) .

* Fact 46 - The aristocratic patronage of homeopathy in the U.K. extended well into the 1940s and beyond can be easily demonstrated. In the Homeopathic Medical Directories there are lists of patrons of the dispensaries and hospitals. They read like an extract from Burke's or Debrett's.

* Fact 47 - The Royal Families of Europe use homeopathic medicine and Queen Elizabeth II of England never travels anywhere without her homeopathic vials of medicine.

* Fact 48 - Homeopathy is practised nowadays in countries all over the world. In India there are 100 homeopathic medical schools and around 250,000 homeopathic doctors.

* Fact 49 - In a recent Global TGI survey where people were asked whether they trust homeopathy the following percentages of people living in urban areas said YES: 62% in India, 58% Brazil, 53% Saudi Arabia, Chile 49%, United Arab Emirates 49%, France 40%, South Africa 35%, Russia 28%, Germany 27%, Argentina 25%, Hungary 25%, USA 18%, UK 15% (http://www.tgisurveys.com/documents/TGIbarom...)

* Fact 50 - The media as a whole has been unwilling to air a defence of the efficacy of homeopathy and the validity of this 250 year old profession.

Read More

Texting invokes the same posture as holding a book Or a baby Or a rock.

Text Neck-the next American epidemic

With the advancement of technology, many lifestyle problem are arising ."Text neck" is one of them. "Text Neck" is the general and epidemic problem of this technology era. Text neck is the problem of looking down at your phone for long period of time completely mindless of your poor posture presentation. 

However, we cannot realize that simply looking down at our phones leads to headache, cervical spondylitis, respiration inefficiencies and even jaw pain. Cervical spondylosis is a disorder in which there is abnormal wear tear on the cartilage and bones of the neck (cervical vertebrae). It is a common cause of chronic neck pain . 

Main body part that is affected due to text neck is spine. Infact, approximately 50% of the population suffers from cervical spondylitis or headache . 70% of patient who present with headache also demonstrate cervical dysfunction. Various spondylitis symptoms appear due to wrong posture like pain in shoulder, neck and pain along the arm. 

With the advancement of technology, everything is becoming easy. We are globally connected via small device that fit in our pockets. Apps replaces personal assistant and reach  and we walk around with heap of songs in our pocket. And yet as  phones get smarter, our posture gets weaker. The biological sustainability of human being is declining at the speed of tech savvy era.

Posture correction of the cervical spine is indicated as treatment method of text neck, cervical spondylitis and headache. The correction of head posture can transform the quality of healthy life of patients who present with Text Neck. This is a matter of high concern  that requires complex attention.

Written by Renu - Sr. Executive PMT Bhargava Phytolab Pvt Ltd. 

Tags:

neck pain , cervical spondylosis , cervical spondylitis , neck pain home remedies , shoulder pain medicine , neck pain, cervical spondylosis, cervical spondylitis, neck pain home remedies, shoulder pain medicine, shoulder pain, lower back pain, spinal stenosis, sciatica, chiropractor, pinched nerve, spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease, sciatic nerve, low back pain, sciatica pain relief, herniated disc, upper back pain, cervical spine, stiff neck, lumbar spine, neck pain causes, headache, lumbar spondylosis, right shoulder pain, sciatica symptoms, back pain causes, sciatic nerve pain, leg pain, pinched nerve in neck, pain in the neck, lower left back pain, pain in neck, back problems, back spasms, bulging disc, sciatica treatment, arm pain, disc herniation, shoulder blade pain, pain in shoulder, chiropractic, lower back pain exercises, shoulder joint pain, severe neck pain, pain in lower back, lumbar stenosis, exercises for lower back pain, sciatic pain, middle back pain, trapped nerve, spinal stenosis treatment, severe back pain, lumbar spinal stenosis, left shoulder pain, laminectomy, cervical spinal stenosis, shoulder pain causes, sciatic nerve pain relief, nerve pain, causes of lower back pain, slipped disc, spinal stenosis surgery, neck problems, neck and back pain, back and neck pain, cervical spondylosis treatment, exercise for back pain, back neck pain, sciatica exercises, neck pain symptoms, backache, spinal decompression, sciatica relief, pinched nerve in lower back, causes of neck pain, pain in left shoulder, pain in back of neck, spondylosis treatment, lumbar pain, back pain remedies, back of neck pain, chronic lower back pain, low back pain exercises, what causes neck pain, pain in back, back pain exercises, herniated disk, cervical arthritis, neck injury, chronic shoulder pain, shoulder problems, back surgery, causes of shoulder pain, neck arthritis, cervical spondylosis symptoms, neck ache, lower back, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, lumbar disc herniation, myofascial pain, pain in shoulder blade, upper back pain causes, pain in upper back, pinched nerve lower back, spondylosis cervical, cervical stenosis, cervical radiculopathy, low back pain treatment, low back pain causes, upper back pain relief, cervical spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic back pain, chest and back pain, sciatic nerve relief, cervical disc herniation, arthritis in the neck, ruptured disc, what causes shoulder pain, shoulder pain exercises, herniated disc treatment, treatment for back pain, chiropractic adjustment, shoulder pain symptoms, spine pain, as back pain, stiff neck pain, lower right back pain, bad back pain, spondylotic changes, back pain lower, back and leg pain, treatment for sciatica, extreme lower back pain, neck nerve pain, pinched nerve neck, herniated disc symptoms, treatment for lower back pain, sciatic nerve treatment, cervical spondylosis exercises, pain in right shoulder, back pain solutions, disk herniation, lower leg pain, upper neck pain, sciatica pain treatment, pain in shoulder and arm, pain in the back of the neck, exercises for low back pain, cervical osteoarthritis, lumbar spine pain, chronic neck and shoulder pain, lumbar back pain, sore shoulder, neck pain exercises, cervical myelopathy, neck and head pain, cervical neck pain, lower back pain right side, cervical disc disease, muscle pain in neck, head pain, herniated disc surgery, remedies for back pain, lower neck pain, lower back muscle pain, pain in shoulder joint, treatment for spinal stenosis, constant lower back pain, neck stiffness, muscle pain in shoulder, spinal decompression therapy, lower back problems, pinched nerves, sore lower back, head and neck pain, pinched nerve treatment, lower back strain, sore neck muscles, neck pain diagnosis, chronic low back pain, pain in the back, pain in the lower back, stiff neck remedies, exercises for neck pain, stiff neck causes, painful shoulder, shoulder pain cancer, neck and arm pain, lumbar laminectomy, painful neck, acute back pain, pain in left shoulder blade, pain in right shoulder blade, sharp lower back pain, back pain diagnosis, sudden lower back pain, acupuncture for back pain, relieve lower back pain, left shoulder blade pain, leg pain causes, cervical spondylosis surgery, bad neck pain, neck pain and stiffness, pain in both shoulders, back injury, lower back and leg pain, decompression therapy, disc bulge, neck back pain, relieve neck pain, relieve back pain, extreme back pain, pain in neck and back, sudden back pain, herniated cervical disc, home remedies for neck pain, lumbar spondylosis treatment, right shoulder blade pain, chiropractic care, cervical spondylosis without myelopathy, arthritis of the neck, sciatic nerve exercises, degenerative spondylolisthesis, pinched nerve in neck treatment, neck exercises for neck pain, arm and shoulder pain, sciatica back pain, constant back pain, bulging disk, top of shoulder pain, spondylosis of the neck, back and neck pain relief, symptoms of back pain, extreme shoulder pain, extreme neck pain, pinched sciatic nerve, arthritis neck, pinched nerve back, arthritis in neck, sciatica cure, back pain management, acute lower back pain, pinched nerve in neck symptoms, back of the neck pain, bad lower back pain, lower back pain left side, pinched nerve in back, back relief

 

Read More

Understand your Neck Pain

Top Tips for Healthy Posture to Avoid Neck Pain

Our increasingly sedentary lifestyles and tendency to spend time in front of a computer screen, TV screen, or looking down at a smartphone or tablet PC is wreaking havoc with our spinal health. According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in the UK, a million working days were lost last year alone due to back pain and/or neck pain and this sets to get even worse unless we sit up and pay attention. 

Preventing neck pain could be as simple as reassessing how we use our body throughout the day, and how we sleep at night. One of the most common causes of neck pain is something called anterior head carriage: where the head is tilted too far forward and extra pressure is put on the structures of the cervical spine. In this position the cervical spinal muscles that run down the back of the neck and shoulders are in a constant state of contraction in order to support the head. This is what leads to sore neck muscles, tight shoulders, neck pain and fatigue.

Screen-Time and Neck Pain

The main cause of this abnormal and damaging posture is sitting staring at a computer screen. We tend to sit in such a way that the natural curve of the lower back is flattened, leading to the shoulders dropping and the head moving forward. This may be compounded by unaddressed vision issues causing us to peer closely at the screen. 

To correct this we should consider sitting as an activity in itself, not a passive state of being. If you imagine a string attached to the top of your head pulling you upwards then this can help keep your pelvis angled forward, the lumbar curve maintained, the shoulders back and the head nicely in alignment to keep the natural curve of the cervical spine. This helps to spread the load on the spine and reduce the likelihood of muscle strain, neck pain, back pain and spinal degeneration.

Sitting as an Activity

Viewing sitting as an active thing can also help us to maintain good muscular health which makes us more resilient to acute trauma. Of course, sitting should not be considered exercise as such and we need to take regular breaks from sitting in order to reset the body and use other muscles. Even a one or two minute walk through the office every half hour can help us to avoid settling into an unhelpful posture. Any damage that is being done to the spine is limited by frequent reassessment of how we’re using the body.

Regular breaks from sitting also give us an opportunity to get a drink of water, stay hydrated, and to breathe freely. We often unconsciously hold our breath when talking on the phone, texting, or looking at something on screen and so getting up and being mindful of how the body is moving can help us to breathe normally and re-oxygenate the muscles. Drinking water also helps to keep the body hydrated and reduce the risk of dry and stressed joint tissue tearing under pressure.

In addition, sitting up and taking notice of posture can help you to acknowledge when your clothing choices, desk layout, or computer set up is affecting how you use your body. Tight clothing or restrictive clothing can prevent us moving naturally, while having files on a low shelf or a keyboard or screen that is too far away from us can lead us to tilt forwards and strain the spine. 

In short, to help prevent neck pain and back pain it is important to:

• Exercise regularly
• Stay hydrated
• Avoid wearing tight or restrictive clothing that disrupts normal posture
• Take regular breaks from staring at the screen
• Be mindful of your body and how you are using it every day.

Read More